Click the cover to read the complete digital edition
All things to all people
Q + A
Mar. 7, 7p. Join the CSN Dance club for its 15th annual student-generated display of kinetic creativity with various types of dance. $8...
People just love them some Tchaikovsky’s Piano Concerto No. 1 in B-flat Minor, Op. 23 — its spirited thrusts and turns, its flights and...
Mar. 8, 2p Cellist, guitarist and singer/songwriter Tucker ‘s voice has been compared to Cleo Laine and Diana Krall’s....
Vegas is not "liveable" -- but it's a good thing!
by Andrew Kiraly | posted May 9, 2011
You've seen those wonkified lists of the world's "Most Liveable Cities" and perhaps secretly inner-cringed at how poor Vegas doesn't make the list time and again. Well, inner-cringe no more! Here's a counter-take on that journalistic genre that proposes that those cities that DO consistently make those coveted lists are Goldilocks burgs that are, well, kinda boooooring. From the Financial Times:
No. Not at all. In fact, Vancouver’s boringly consistent topping of the polls underlines the fundamental fault that lies at the heart of the idea of measuring cities by their “liveability”. The most recent surveys, from Monocle magazine, Forbes, Mercer and The Economist, concur: Vancouver, Vienna, Zurich, Geneva, Copenhagen and Munich dominate the top. What, you might ask, no New York? No London? No LA or HK? None of the cities that people seem to actually want to emigrate to, to set up businesses in? To be in? None of the wealthiest, flashiest, fastest or most beautiful cities? Nope. Americans in particular seem to get wound up by the lack of US cities in the top tier. The one that does make it is Pittsburgh. Which winds them up even more.
And finally! Somebody makes a jab at Copenhagen.
Pick up your Desert Companion today at one of these Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf or Jamba Juice locations.
Also available at Clark County and Henderson libraries.