Nevada Public Radio Listen Live

"All Things Considered"
Facebook Twitter Follow Nevada Public Radio

Support Nevada Public Radio
KNPR's State of Nevada About SON Archives Participate Specials
Is The Cosmopolitan Of Las Vegas For Sale?
The HOA: Help Or Headache?
Gillespie On Bundy, Officer Shootings
Reno: News From The North
No Way Any Convention Is Coming To Las Vegas
Bundyfest: It Could Happen
Reid Vs. Heller On Bundy Standoff
Lowden Embraces Changing Senate Elections
The State Of The Clark County School District
Reno A Frontrunner For Tesla Plant
States Look At Marijuana Laws
Gut Feeling: What We Learned From The Hadza About Digestion
Missing Out On A High School Diploma
The Progressive Bluegrass Sounds Of The Infamous Stringdusters
Why Don't We Know Who's Behind the Kelly Cheating Scandal?
Las Vegas City Council Votes For Horse-Drawn Carriages
Utah Keeps 'Utes' As Mascot
The Good Foods Of Lent
Robert Coover And The Return Of The Brunists
How Safe Is Your Food?
Castro And Patrick Spar Over Immigration
Boycott Las Vegas Say Social Conservatives
Behind The Bundy Ranch Standoff
Can 'Serious' Reading Happen Online?
Lynne Jasames On Why 'It's Okay To Cry'
BASE Jumping: The Allure And The Danger
Anti-Government Protesters Win Round Against BLM
Tax Advice For The Alternative Economy
The Secret History Of Las Vegas

Jury Awards Suen $70 Million In Sands Case
Jury Awards Suen $70 Million In Sands Case

AIR DATE: May 15, 2013


Hannah Dreier, Las Vegas Reporter, Associated Press

BY IAN MYLCHREEST -- Las Vegas Sands lost for the second time on Tuesday when a Clark County jury awarded Hong Kong businessman Richard Suen $70 million. The case turned on whether or not Suen had helped Sands win a casino license in the Chinese enclave of Macau.

Suen claimed he was owed $5 million plus 2 percent of profits. When he took the stand, Sands CEO and Chairman Sheldon Adelson painted Suen as a failed businessman and “really kind of a dunce,” says Associated Press Reporter Hannah Dreier in an interview with Nevada Public Radio. Adelson testified that he had merely been doing his brother a favor when he met with Suen.

The businessman’s attorneys argued, however, that their client had a written contract for his consulting work. But even if Suen’s contract was too vague, they argued, he had clearly worked for the company to win the license and deserved some kind of compensation. The jury, says Dreier, went with that second argument.

The jury also had to consider how important personal relationships (or “guanxi” as it’s known in Mandarin) are in Chinese business. Suen claimed he held had two meetings with a Vice Premier and another meeting with the mayor of Beijing. Sands rejected those as insignificant, noting that Macanese authorities had made their decision independently.

Despite the two trial losses, Dreier says, a Sands appeal is inevitable. Despite being grilled on the stand for three days in the latest trial, Dreier says, “You’ve got to think (Adelson) doesn’t mind if he’s coming back for another shot at it.”

    comments powered by Disqus
    Web hosting facilities provided by Switch.