Nevada Public Radio Listen Live

"Morning Edition"
Facebook Twitter Follow Nevada Public Radio

Support Nevada Public Radio
KNPR's State of Nevada About SON Archives Participate Specials
TODAY
Life In Baker, California
Is The Cosmopolitan Of Las Vegas For Sale?
The HOA: Help Or Headache?
RECENT
Reid Vs. Heller On Bundy Standoff
Lowden Embraces Changing Senate Elections
The State Of The Clark County School District
Reno A Frontrunner For Tesla Plant
States Look At Marijuana Laws
Gut Feeling: What We Learned From The Hadza About Digestion
Missing Out On A High School Diploma
The Progressive Bluegrass Sounds Of The Infamous Stringdusters
Why Don't We Know Who's Behind the Kelly Cheating Scandal?
Las Vegas City Council Votes For Horse-Drawn Carriages
Utah Keeps 'Utes' As Mascot
The Good Foods Of Lent
Robert Coover And The Return Of The Brunists
How Safe Is Your Food?
Castro And Patrick Spar Over Immigration
Boycott Las Vegas Say Social Conservatives
Behind The Bundy Ranch Standoff
Can 'Serious' Reading Happen Online?
Lynne Jasames On Why 'It's Okay To Cry'
BASE Jumping: The Allure And The Danger
Anti-Government Protesters Win Round Against BLM
Tax Advice For The Alternative Economy
The Secret History Of Las Vegas

What Does Supreme Court DOMA Ruling Mean For Nevada?
What Does Supreme Court DOMA Ruling Mean For Nevada?

Listen
AIR DATE: June 26, 2013

GUEST

Tod Story, Executive Director, ACLU of Nevada

BY JOAN WHITELY -- One Las Vegas gay couple is already talking about a California wedding, in light of two rulings about gay marriage that the U.S. Supreme Court announced Wednesday.

California is looking “very appealing” for holding a legal ceremony, Las Vegan Tod Story says. But Story says he will also be part of the ongoing struggle for Nevada to legalize same-gender marriage.

“A win for loving couples” is how he described the two decisions from the high court.

Story is executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada. He also is gay. He and his partner have been together 21 years. They’re considering obtaining a marriage license in California when that state resumes issuing marriage licenses, in as short as a month, as a result of one of the Supreme Court decisions. Both marriage-related decisions were close splits, 5-4.

First, the court struck a portion of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which Congress passed in 1996. The court invalidated the law’s definition of marriage as limited to a couple composed of one male, one female.

Writing for the majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy called it a violation of liberty and equal protection to deny partners in a legally recognized gay marriage any federal benefits that heterosexual spouses receive. The old definition told gays that “their marriage is less worthy than the marriages of others,” the decision reads. The decision leaves in place the federal provision that no state is required to recognize gay marriage performed legally in another state, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Federal benefits to spouses include pension rights and tax breaks, including the inheritance tax.  In the case the high court looked at, a New York woman who had been with her female patner for more htan 40 years was ordered to pay the Internal Revenue Service an estate tax of more than $363,000 – a tab that a widowed heterosexual would not face. The two women had married in Canada in 2007, the L.A. Times also reported.

According to Story, this change in federal law will benefit gay Nevadans who have married in one of the states that currently recognize gay marriage. More than 1,000 benefits and duties exist under federal law for people who are married, he added.

The second Supreme Court decision dissolves California’s ban on gay marriages, called Proposition 8, which the state’s voters passed in 2008 but was determined unconstitutional by two lower levels of federal. Specifically, the Supreme Court said the ban proponents who brought the challenge lacked legal standing; California’s governor and attorney general – who would have standing – had declined to enforce law.

This second decision allows California to revert to its status before the Prop 8 ban, which did allow gay marriage. That may create a tide of Nevada gay residents going to the California for nuptials.

 

    comments powered by Disqus
    © 2013 NEVADA PUBLIC RADIO   
    Web hosting facilities provided by Switch.