Nevada Public Radio Listen Live

"BBC's World Service"
Facebook Twitter Follow Nevada Public Radio

Support Nevada Public Radio
KNPR's State of Nevada About SON Archives Participate Specials
TODAY
Council Votes For Horse-Drawn Carriages
The Progressive Bluegrass Sounds Of The Infamous Stringdusters
The Good Foods Of Lent
RECENT
Boycott Las Vegas Say Social Conservatives
How Safe Is Your Food?
Robert Coover And The Return Of The Brunists
Castro And Patrick Spar Over Immigration
Behind The Bundy Ranch Standoff
Can 'Serious' Reading Happen Online?
Lynne Jasames On Why 'It's Okay To Cry'
BASE Jumping: The Allure And The Danger
Tax Advice For The Alternative Economy
The Secret History Of Las Vegas
Anti-Government Protesters Win Round Against BLM
Bryan Ferry (Of Roxy Music) Brings His Orchestra To Vegas
Is Tipping Obsolete?
Deal Reached Between North Las Vegas And Labor Unions
Being Oscar
The Life Cycle Of A Mall
Fixing Nevada's Mental Health System
Bundy Family Says Local Officials Need to Step In To Stop BLM Dispute
The Future Of Space Tourism

Resident Sues Against North Las Vegas Mortgage Plan
Resident Sues Against North Las Vegas Mortgage Plan

Listen
AIR DATE: July 3, 2013

GUEST

Bradley Schrager, attorney, Wolf Rifkin Shapiro Schulman & Rabkin

BY MARIE ANDRUSEWICZ -- Attorney Bradley Schrager says that there is almost no government power more “sacred,  important or dangerous” than the power to seize properties by eminent domain, and that the current plan by the city of North Las Vegas to rescue underwater homeowners doesn’t meet legal precedent.  He and his client Gregory Smith are taking a stand against the procedure on Constitutional grounds.

According to Smith, eminent domain very specifically states that the property seized has to be put forward for a public use – but the plan put forth by the city of North Las Vegas would actually benefit individual homeowners.

He also says that eminent domain can potentially be used to protect neighborhoods from blight, but at this point whether the city would face blight as a result of homeowners failing to pay loans is purely speculative.

“Eminent domain has traditionally been used in instances of actual blight, rather than feared blight,” says Schrager.

Schrager says that North Las Vegas motives in helping homeowners may be “laudable” but their intentions have nothing to do with the legality of the case.

The city of North Las Vegas is working in partnership with Mortgage Resolution Partners to execute the plan. According to the deal, city officials would seize the bad home loan as they would seize a blighted property.  Approximately 5,000 homes in North Las Vegas are eligible for the program, according to the lawsuit.

    comments powered by Disqus
    COMMENTS:
    Of course, it's unconstitutional, for it's using the power of government to take one person's property and give it to another, more favored person. Remember, the Founders called eminent domain "the despotic power" because they had seen that it was *always* abused, and always to the maximum extent possible - which is just what is happening here. Indeed, most of those Founders that we revere as lovers of liberty opposed giving any eminent domain power at all to government.
    Tom HurstJul 2, 2013 17:25:19 PM
    © 2013 NEVADA PUBLIC RADIO   
    Web hosting facilities provided by Switch.