Nevada Public Radio Listen Live

"Sound Opinions"
Facebook Twitter Follow Nevada Public Radio

Support Nevada Public Radio
KNPR's State of Nevada About SON Archives Participate Specials
Mark Kleiman Talks Marijuana Laws
Gut Feeling: What We Learned From The Hazda About Digestion
Missing Out On A High School Diploma
Council Votes For Horse-Drawn Carriages
Utah Keeps 'Utes' As Mascot
The Progressive Bluegrass Sounds Of The Infamous Stringdusters
Why Don't We Know Who's Behind the Kelly Cheating Scandal?
The Good Foods Of Lent
Castro And Patrick Spar Over Immigration
Boycott Las Vegas Say Social Conservatives
How Safe Is Your Food?
Robert Coover And The Return Of The Brunists
Behind The Bundy Ranch Standoff
Can 'Serious' Reading Happen Online?
BASE Jumping: The Allure And The Danger
Lynne Jasames On Why 'It's Okay To Cry'
Tax Advice For The Alternative Economy
The Secret History Of Las Vegas
Anti-Government Protesters Win Round Against BLM
Deal Reached Between North Las Vegas And Labor Unions
Bryan Ferry (Of Roxy Music) Brings His Orchestra To Vegas
Is Tipping Obsolete?
Being Oscar
The Life Cycle Of A Mall

Lambda Legal On Nevada Same-Sex Marriage Lawsuit
Lambda Legal On Nevada Same-Sex Marriage Lawsuit

AIR DATE: July 5, 2013


Tara Borelli, Lambda Legal attorney

BY JOAN WHITELY -- Nevada’s present ban of gay marriage will be one of the first federal appeals cases on the issue to be heard since the U.S. Supreme Court revised federal law on marriage benefits and cleared a path for California to dismantle its voter-approved gay marriage ban.

Both Supreme Court decisions improve the climate for the Nevada appeal, says Tara Borelli of Lambda Legal. Borelli is the lead attorney for eight same-sex couples who went to court in 2012 to win the right to marry in Nevada, whose voters have twice upheld the state’s present ban.

“Society is strengthened when we have more and more couples in the institution of marriage,” said Borelli. The Supreme Court in June declined to hear her clients’ case, which means it now heads to the U.S. Circuit of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which is known for leaning liberal. Borelli’s team will attack the decision by U.S. District Court Judge Robert Jones of Reno in late 2012, which upheld Nevada’s ban.

The lead couple in the Nevada suit is composed of two Carson City women in their 70s, who have been together more than 40 years. “They’re the two proud grandmothers of four grandchildren,” said Borelli. Among the other plaintiffs are a lawyer, a graduate student, a musician, a schoolteacher and a social worker.

The “heart of Judge Jones’ decision,” according to Borelli, is his reasoning that “some significant percentage of heterosexual people may no longer want to be associated with marriage if same-sex couples can marry. And that might make them more likely to have children outside of wedlock, which would be bad for children.”

But Borelli said she’s confident the appeals court will overturn Jones, because judges tend to be suspicious of “majoritarian action” by voters when the majority seeks to impose on the minority “something which the majority wouldn’t accept for itself,”  which is, in this case, making marriage off limits. “We don’t just allow constitutional rights to people when they can win a popularity contest” by vote tally, she added.

    comments powered by Disqus
    Web hosting facilities provided by Switch.