Nevada Public Radio Listen Live

"Fresh Air"
Facebook Twitter Follow Nevada Public Radio

Support Nevada Public Radio
KNPR's State of Nevada About SON Archives Participate Specials
Gillespie On Bundy, Officer Shootings
Reno: News From The North
Columnist: No Way Any Convention Is Coming To Las Vegas
Bundyfest: It Could Happen
Life In Baker, California
Bryce Harper Benched In Washington
The HOA: Help Or Headache?
Is The Cosmopolitan Of Las Vegas For Sale?
Reno A Frontrunner For Tesla Plant
Reid Vs. Heller On Bundy Standoff
Lowden Embraces Changing Senate Elections
The State Of The Clark County School District
States Look At Marijuana Laws
Gut Feeling: What We Learned From The Hadza About Digestion
Missing Out On A High School Diploma
Las Vegas City Council Votes For Horse-Drawn Carriages
The Good Foods Of Lent
Utah Keeps 'Utes' As Mascot
Why Don't We Know Who's Behind the Kelly Cheating Scandal?
The Progressive Bluegrass Sounds Of The Infamous Stringdusters
Castro And Patrick Spar Over Immigration
Boycott Las Vegas Say Social Conservatives
How Safe Is Your Food?
Robert Coover And The Return Of The Brunists
Behind The Bundy Ranch Standoff
Can 'Serious' Reading Happen Online?
Lynne Jasames On Why 'It's Okay To Cry'
BASE Jumping: The Allure And The Danger

The Future of Nevada's Marriage Amendment
The Future of Nevada's Marriage Amendment

AIR DATE: March 2, 2011

In 2002, Nevada voters added an amendment to the state constitution defining marriage as between one man and one woman. That seemed like pretty clear language. But last summer, Judge Vaughn Walker ruled last summer that Proposition 8 in California was unconstitutional. If that decision is upheld, it would also invalidate Nevada's marriage amendment. And last week the Department of Justice announced it would no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act. So is Nevada close to gay marriage? Even if the marriage amendment is unconstitutional, does it mean that marriage has to be available to gay couples?

Jim Davis, attorney, Kunin and Carman
Richard Ziser, former Chair, Nevada Concerned Citizens
Vikram Amar, Prof of Con Law, University of California, Davis

comments powered by Disqus
Your guest pointed out that marriage has been the same of thousands of years so that is a main reason of why it shouldn't be changed. Slavery has been around for thousand of years as well. I believe when the government views marriage, it is actually a business contract between 2 people and denying it to the homosexual population is the same as telling me I could not has a contract with some one that isn't the same race as I am. Marriage between whites and non-whites was illegal at one time too.
stephenFeb 28, 2011 10:29:10 AM
Please ask the panel what happened to the separation of church and state? laws should not be based on their religious believes..
JoseFeb 28, 2011 10:20:56 AM
Web hosting facilities provided by Switch.