Nevada Public Radio Listen Live

"BBC's World Service"
Facebook Twitter Follow Nevada Public Radio

Support Nevada Public Radio
KNPR's State of Nevada About SON Archives Participate Specials
Rescue Dogs, Dogs That Rescue
Do Investors Manipulate Short Sales?
Let's Talk About Beer
Gillespie On Bundy, Officer Shootings
Reno: News From The North
Columnist: No Way Any Convention Is Coming To Las Vegas
Bundyfest: It Could Happen
Life In Baker, California
Bryce Harper Benched In Washington
Is The Cosmopolitan Of Las Vegas For Sale?
The HOA: Help Or Headache?
The State Of The Clark County School District
Reno A Frontrunner For Tesla Plant
Reid Vs. Heller On Bundy Standoff
Lowden Embraces Changing Senate Elections
Missing Out On A High School Diploma
States Look At Marijuana Laws
Gut Feeling: What We Learned From The Hadza About Digestion
The Good Foods Of Lent
Why Don't We Know Who's Behind the Kelly Cheating Scandal?
Las Vegas City Council Votes For Horse-Drawn Carriages
Utah Keeps 'Utes' As Mascot
The Progressive Bluegrass Sounds Of The Infamous Stringdusters
Castro And Patrick Spar Over Immigration
Boycott Las Vegas Say Social Conservatives
How Safe Is Your Food?
Robert Coover And The Return Of The Brunists
Behind The Bundy Ranch Standoff

The Alleged Beating of Mitchell Crooks
The Alleged Beating of Mitchell Crooks

AIR DATE: April 27, 2011

On Friday the Las Vegas Review-Journal posted live footage of a police beating. The video comes from a March 20 altercation between videographer Mitchell Crooks, and Metro Police officer Derek Colling.
Colling's police report claims Mitchell Crooks resisted arrest. But Crooks and his attorney say he was filming police from his own property and was well within his rights. The Clark County District Attorney has dropped all charges against Crooks.  
We talk with David Otto, Crooks' attorney, about the incident, the video and the complaint against the Las Vegas Metro Police Department.

comments powered by Disqus
The law enforcment in this case responded to the situation with the appropriate amount of initial action. The officer clearly asked if he lived there and the victim responded with a simple answer. "No". The officers were responding to a supposed break-in and here stands a person with a camera for all intensive purposes admitting trespassing. He should have responded more clearly to the officer. I have no sympathy for this man.
Anthony M.Apr 25, 2011 09:59:01 AM
And you sir, are an idiot.
AnonApr 26, 2011 21:42:55 PM
"for all intensive purposes admitted trespassing"!!???? No he didn't. The single "no" answer to "do you live here?" doesn't admit trespassing. He could have easily been there with the property owner's permission. For all we know, he could have been at his friend's house (for example) to feed his cat while his friend was on vacation. If officer Colling had been truly interested in whether Mitchell Crooks was trespassing, he would have asked more questions related to why Mitchell Crooks was there. According to the news report, the police were investigating the house across the street. Mitchell Crooks was not interfering with their work. In this video, it is clear that Officer Colling was the aggressor.
AlexApr 26, 2011 22:10:50 PM
Web hosting facilities provided by Switch.