Nevada Public Radio Listen Live

"KNPR's State of Nevada"
Facebook Twitter Follow Nevada Public Radio

Support Nevada Public Radio
KNPR's State of Nevada About SON Archives Participate Specials
Castro And Patrick Spar Over Immigration
Boycott Las Vegas Say Social Conservatives
How Safe Is Your Food?
Robert Coover And The Return Of The Brunists
Behind The Bundy Ranch Standoff
Can 'Serious' Reading Happen Online?
Lynne Jasames On Why 'It's Okay To Cry'
BASE Jumping: The Allure And The Danger
Anti-Government Protesters Win Round Against BLM
Tax Advice For The Alternative Economy
The Secret History Of Las Vegas
Bryan Ferry (Of Roxy Music) Brings His Orchestra To Vegas
Deal Reached Between North Las Vegas And Labor Unions
Is Tipping Obsolete?
Being Oscar
The Life Cycle Of A Mall
Bundy Family Says Local Officials Need to Step In To Stop BLM Dispute
The Future Of Space Tourism
Fixing Nevada's Mental Health System
UNR President Seeks To Restore Funding
The Brass Tacks Of The Education Initiative

The State of the Wedding Industry
The State of the Wedding Industry

AIR DATE: August 10, 2011

The wedding industry in Las Vegas has been on a decline since its peak in 2004 when 128,250 people were married in Clark County. The notion of coming to Las Vegas for a quickie wedding at a drive-through chapel has lost its luster. Industry insiders say it could be because of the slumping economy and others say those in the wedding business haven't given people a good enough reason to want to come to Las Vegas and get married. Now, chapels are trying to convince couples to come to Las Vegas and renew their vows as a way to boost business. We talk with a panel of wedding business experts about the state of the industry in Las Vegas.
Cliff Evarts, CEO and Founder, Vegas Weddings
Joni Moss, VP, Nevada Wedding Association
    comments powered by Disqus
    I was offended you sanitized Nye County Treasures comments concerning the Latino construction workers in Pahrump. The issue was not about these people being legal or illegal immigrants. Matson's comments were purely racist and inflammatory comments about hard working individuals. Matson further stated that her comments were based on prior experience with these dirty, filthy, criminals. However, each example she sited could not be substantiated by any of the prior police reports she claims to have filed. Matson also claimed that these Latino individuals were terrorizing everybody that came into her office. Again, this was a claim she could not substantiate. The issue was also raised about Matson having a right to free speech. She does have the right to express her opinion. But, that right does not extend to using her public office to express her personal beliefs.
    Scott CulshawAug 9, 2011 10:05:49 AM
    Web hosting facilities provided by Switch.