Nevada Public Radio Listen Live

"Vinyl Cafe"
Facebook Twitter Follow Nevada Public Radio

Support Nevada Public Radio
KNPR's State of Nevada About SON Archives Participate Specials
UPCOMING
Mark Kleiman Talks Marijuana Laws
Gut Feeling: What We Learned From The Hazda About Digestion
Missing Out On A High School Diploma
RECENT
Council Votes For Horse-Drawn Carriages
Utah Keeps 'Utes' As Mascot
The Progressive Bluegrass Sounds Of The Infamous Stringdusters
Why Don't We Know Who's Behind the Kelly Cheating Scandal?
The Good Foods Of Lent
Castro And Patrick Spar Over Immigration
Boycott Las Vegas Say Social Conservatives
How Safe Is Your Food?
Robert Coover And The Return Of The Brunists
Behind The Bundy Ranch Standoff
Can 'Serious' Reading Happen Online?
BASE Jumping: The Allure And The Danger
Lynne Jasames On Why 'It's Okay To Cry'
Tax Advice For The Alternative Economy
The Secret History Of Las Vegas
Anti-Government Protesters Win Round Against BLM
Deal Reached Between North Las Vegas And Labor Unions
Bryan Ferry (Of Roxy Music) Brings His Orchestra To Vegas
Is Tipping Obsolete?
Being Oscar
The Life Cycle Of A Mall

Freeways versus Homeowners: The Case of Eminent Domain
Freeways versus Homeowners: The Case of Eminent Domain

Listen
AIR DATE: February 14, 2012

The I-15 is going to be widened as part of a four phase project called Project Neon.  With the expansion some homes and businesses will have to be demolished.  When does the public good outweigh a homeowner's rights?  What sort of value do these homeowners and business owners get for their properties considering they are being forced to leave?

GUESTS
Cristina Gibson, resident, Saratoga Meadows Neighborhood
Shelly Walters, Saratoga Meadows Neighborhood
Paul Saucedo, Chief Right of Way Agent
Cole Mortensen Project Manager for Project Neon
Kermitt Waters, led the People's Initiative to Stop the Taking of Our Land [PISTOL], attorney, Law Offices of Kermitt L. Waters


LINKS
comments powered by Disqus
COMMENTS:
Kermit Waters stated that the administrative settlement would off-set the replacement housing payment offered under the relocation program. This would normally be true, however, the FHWA has a program in place that allows the home owner to receive BOTH payments with no off-set. So, a home owner that owe $50,000 over the amount offered by the State will get the additional $50,000 to pay off the mortgage AND any replacement housing payment needed to get the displaced home owner into a new home.
Ruth BorrelliFeb 25, 2012 08:07:55 AM
© 2013 NEVADA PUBLIC RADIO   
Web hosting facilities provided by Switch.