Nevada Public Radio Banner
KNPR's State of Nevada About SON Archives Participate Specials
UPCOMING DISCUSSIONS
Getting Away With Gun Violence
HUD Threatens To Take Back Navajo Housing Dollars
Could Yucca Mountain Be Revived?
"Behind The Candelabra" Pianist Returns To Concert Stage
RECENT DISCUSSIONS
China -- Friend Or Foe?
Should Kids Be Able To Just Leave Shelters? Child Haven Revisited
The Very Few And The Not So Proud
Nevada's Solar Future May Not Be So Sunny
A Bad Bet: The Legislature Shuts Down Sports Kiosks
Strife In The Sky
Can Eminent Domain Save North Las Vegas Homeowners?
Sen. Justin Jones Talks Background Checks
DOJ Expected To Join Negotiations With Arpaio Attorneys
X-Hunters Search For Secret History Of Air Force
Replacing James Guthrie
New Exams For Firefighters After Cheating Scandal
More Troubles With Las Vegas Constable
How To Help A Grieving Student
Tyrone Thompson, Replacement Assemblyman
Foreclosure Report Shows Divide in Homeowner Attitudes

AIR DATE: July 30, 2012
LISTEN TO M3U | DOWNLOAD MP3

A new study suggests that at least one type of foreclosure may be losing some of its stigma.

According to the 2012 Face of Foreclosure report, 45 percent of those surveyed felt that walking away from an underwater mortgage, or “strategic default,” is OK, while 45 percent thought homeowners should honor their financial obligations.

“The trend is that its more socially acceptable now to make a business decision that it is no longer worth holding on to the property, and to go ahead and let that go back to the bank,” says Blane Johnson, president of the Nevada Realtors Association. “You just hand over the keys and walk away.”

According to the report, there’s been an uptick in homeowners who are behind on their payments and are going the strategic default route. Johnson says that taking this path is viewed as a business decision similar to moving on after losing money on any other bad investment.

Another factor in favor of the defaulting homeowner is something the report refers to as the “plus one factor.” This means that the homeowner experienced a setback in addition to a foreclosure, such as a job loss or a medical bill.

“There are two events collaborated to cause a strain on you where a lot of people unfortunately lost their homes,” says Johnson. “So some peoples’ credit score, while it was damaged, are going to be able to recoup more quickly.”

The public perception of foreclosure may be changing, but public attitudes toward home ownership are not, according to Johnson. Even people who have gone through the painful process of losing a home are eager to get back into the market.

“A huge majority said they’d go buy a house again,” he says. “People love the idea of home ownership. They like buying into their community.”

And once and future homeowners who have gone through the foreclosure process may find lenders surprisingly forgiving.  

“Lenders are starting to understand that a lot of people went through a short sale or a foreclosure, and they take that into consideration,” says Johnson. “Hopefully there’s going to be some sort of leeway with these fico scores going forward.”

 


LINKS


Foreclosure Report Shows Divide in Homeowner Attitudes
I agree that the individual homeowner is ...
-Lvjackie
Why should we expect mother government to ...
-Tom Hurst
The split is due to propaganda, some people ...
-Jennifer Florio
Join the Conversation   
Join the Discussion
COMMENTS:
I agree that the individual homeowner is being made the fall guy and it makes me mad! Today I read an article stating that Goldman Sachs had a 500 million dollar fund and Blackstone had a 200 million dollar to buy up REO properties and rent them back to us. So the distressed homeowner will not get the write down or refi but Goldman Sachs will. You the person who lives and works here well you will now be a class of renters and good luck getting them to fix the water heater. So sad!
LvjackieAug 2, 2012 11:35:26 AM


Why should we expect mother government to bail out either banks or homeowners? Businesses - including banks - and individuals make bad investment decisions and fail every day. The proper course was, and is, to just take the losses, let the market clear, and then move on. Of course, in socialist America, it's the taxpayer that is expected to take all of the losses, whether it be bank losses or homeowner losses.
Tom HurstJul 30, 2012 08:51:16 AM


The split is due to propaganda, some people believe what the banksters tell them to believe...brass tax...the banks created the situation, they were bailed out (corporate socialism) they were given TARP money, and the people got hung out to dry. If we were honest with ourselves, we would know that this is not a capitalist system, otherwise the banks would have failed (all of them) we the people would have to clean up a mess and we would be better off today.
Jennifer FlorioJul 29, 2012 20:22:47 PM


Join the Discussion
07/30/12 RUNDOWN
Foreclosure Report Shows Divide in Homeowner Attitudes
Winning the Jewish Vote
Moral Hazard of Drone Warfare
Exploring Performance Art
Summer Camp! The Musical


© 2012 NEVADA PUBLIC RADIO   
Web hosting facilities provided by Switch.