Nevada Public Radio Listen Live

"KNPR's State of Nevada"
Facebook Twitter Follow Nevada Public Radio

Support Nevada Public Radio
KNPR's State of Nevada About SON Archives Participate Specials
Life In Baker, California
Is The Cosmopolitan Of Las Vegas For Sale?
The HOA: Help Or Headache?
Reid Vs. Heller On Bundy Standoff
Lowden Embraces Changing Senate Elections
The State Of The Clark County School District
Reno A Frontrunner For Tesla Plant
States Look At Marijuana Laws
Gut Feeling: What We Learned From The Hadza About Digestion
Missing Out On A High School Diploma
The Progressive Bluegrass Sounds Of The Infamous Stringdusters
Why Don't We Know Who's Behind the Kelly Cheating Scandal?
Las Vegas City Council Votes For Horse-Drawn Carriages
Utah Keeps 'Utes' As Mascot
The Good Foods Of Lent
Robert Coover And The Return Of The Brunists
How Safe Is Your Food?
Castro And Patrick Spar Over Immigration
Boycott Las Vegas Say Social Conservatives
Behind The Bundy Ranch Standoff
Can 'Serious' Reading Happen Online?
Lynne Jasames On Why 'It's Okay To Cry'
BASE Jumping: The Allure And The Danger
Anti-Government Protesters Win Round Against BLM
Tax Advice For The Alternative Economy
The Secret History Of Las Vegas

Rep. Titus Talks About The Sequester
Rep. Titus Talks About The Sequester

AIR DATE: March 5, 2013

If Congress doesn't act soon, more than $85 million in automatic spending cuts will hit programs that provide everything from national defense to early childhood education. It's the latest in a series of budgetary crises that started with the deal to raise the debt ceiling in 2011. We'll talk to Rep. Dina Titus, who represents District 1, about the possible impacts of sequestration on Southern Nevada, and what will happen if the cuts come to pass.


Rep. Dina Titus, Democrat, District 1

    comments powered by Disqus
    I see no problem at all with sequestration cuts because 1) the federal budget has, shockingly, doubled in just the last 10 years, and 2) the 2.5% overall cut is not, as I understand it, even a cut per se, but just a decrease in planned increases, i.e. the total money spent on government will still increase even with the sequestration. If we somehow can't implement and survive such truly trivial reductions in spending, how will we ever balance the budget long-term? My guess for the end-game is that Uncle Ben will give us a bunch of green-inked paper and tell us we're all wealthy.
    Tom HurstFeb 26, 2013 15:54:45 PM
    Web hosting facilities provided by Switch.