Nevada Public Radio Listen Live

"Morning Edition"
Facebook Twitter Follow Nevada Public Radio

Support Nevada Public Radio
KNPR's State of Nevada About SON Archives Participate Specials
Mark Kleiman Talks Marijuana Laws
Missing Out On A High School Diploma
Gut Feeling: What We Learned From The Hazda About Digestion
Council Votes For Horse-Drawn Carriages
Utah Keeps 'Utes' As Mascot
The Progressive Bluegrass Sounds Of The Infamous Stringdusters
Why Don't We Know Who's Behind the Kelly Cheating Scandal?
The Good Foods Of Lent
Robert Coover And The Return Of The Brunists
Castro And Patrick Spar Over Immigration
Boycott Las Vegas Say Social Conservatives
How Safe Is Your Food?
Behind The Bundy Ranch Standoff
Lynne Jasames On Why 'It's Okay To Cry'
BASE Jumping: The Allure And The Danger
Can 'Serious' Reading Happen Online?
Anti-Government Protesters Win Round Against BLM
Tax Advice For The Alternative Economy
The Secret History Of Las Vegas

Reno Gazette-Journal Investigates How Plea Deals Might Weaken Gun Laws
Reno Gazette-Journal Investigates How Plea Deals Might Weaken Gun Laws

AIR DATE: March 22, 2013

An RGJ investigation into gun purchases reveals plea deals often undermine gun laws in Nevada. In one case, a northern Nevada woman bought 32 guns in Reno for a man who was wanted for murder in California. Her punishment was five months probation. According to the RGJ's investigation of the 112 firearms cases prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's office in Reno from 2008 to 2012, only two went to trial and about 95 percent of those were resolved with plea deals. Why are so few cases going to trial? And do plea deals lessen the effect of gun laws in Nevada? We'll talk with the RGJ's investigator about the specific cases involved.


Martha Bellisle, Reporter, Reno Gazette Journal

    comments powered by Disqus
    Since nationally 97% of Federal cases are resolved by plea bargain and that generally involves reducing the number of counts or charges, I am not quite sure what her point is. While I would agree with her other point that the straw purchasers should get more punishment, that is Congress's fault not the US Attorney. Except for the felons identified in her story (that got long prison terms), the other defendants charges would have resulted in less than 2 years (using the required Federal sentencing guidelines)even if they went to trial. Yes imprisonment would be harsher (and deserved) but 5 years probation actually keeps them in the system longer.
    Scott MillerMar 20, 2013 12:36:25 PM
    Web hosting facilities provided by Switch.