Nevada Public Radio Listen Live

"Vinyl Cafe"
Facebook Twitter Follow Nevada Public Radio

Support Nevada Public Radio
KNPR's State of Nevada About SON Archives Participate Specials
Mark Kleiman Talks Marijuana Laws
Gut Feeling: What We Learned From The Hazda About Digestion
Missing Out On A High School Diploma
Council Votes For Horse-Drawn Carriages
Utah Keeps 'Utes' As Mascot
The Progressive Bluegrass Sounds Of The Infamous Stringdusters
Why Don't We Know Who's Behind the Kelly Cheating Scandal?
The Good Foods Of Lent
Castro And Patrick Spar Over Immigration
Boycott Las Vegas Say Social Conservatives
How Safe Is Your Food?
Robert Coover And The Return Of The Brunists
Behind The Bundy Ranch Standoff
Can 'Serious' Reading Happen Online?
BASE Jumping: The Allure And The Danger
Lynne Jasames On Why 'It's Okay To Cry'
Tax Advice For The Alternative Economy
The Secret History Of Las Vegas
Anti-Government Protesters Win Round Against BLM
Deal Reached Between North Las Vegas And Labor Unions
Bryan Ferry (Of Roxy Music) Brings His Orchestra To Vegas
Is Tipping Obsolete?
Being Oscar
The Life Cycle Of A Mall

Nevada Legislature Looks At Animal Welfare
Nevada Legislature Looks At Animal Welfare

AIR DATE: April 4, 2013

Animal welfare activists are ratcheting up the pressure on the Nevada legislature. Currently lawmakers are facing bills that would end the practice of horse tripping, put a stop to bear hunting, and even limit what wild animals we can feed. And exotic animal ownership would be limited to zoos and Strip entertainers.
Does this legislation protect wildlife, or put unnecessary restrictions on hunters, entertainers, and those who feel they’re offering sanctuary to wild animals?
Stacia Newman, Nevada Political Action for Animals
Holly Haley, Nevada State Director, HSUS
Scott Shoemaker, Responsible Exotic Animal Ownership


    comments powered by Disqus
    Attempting to minimize the potential danger of captive tigers and other dangerous wild animals by comparing them with the number of injuries or fatal attacks caused by dogs is misleading. It fails to take into consideration that a relatively small number of big cats are responsible for a relatively large number of attacks. If the ratio of animals to fatal attacks is compared, tigers are 360720 times more likely to be involved in a fatal attack than dogs.
    Sam GregoryMar 27, 2013 10:06:12 AM
    These bans are passed under the guise of public safety. Dogs kill more people and dogs are public safety issue, since many attack random people in public places, like kids on the way to school. Fatal exotic attacks occur on the property where the animals are kept to owners/handlers, NOT in public places, that is occupation/hobby hazard, NOT a public safety issue, since random public is NOT attacked.
    ZuzanaMar 27, 2013 11:22:05 AM
    This isn't Animal WELFARE, this s ANIMAL RIGHTS. I am surprised that the reporter doesn't know the difference. Also, private owners of exotic pets treat their pets like Family. The majority of *incidents* occur in Zoos and Entertainment venues, exactly the people this ill-conceived Law will exempt. >^,,^<
    Kat MalsteadMar 27, 2013 09:48:28 AM
    Web hosting facilities provided by Switch.